Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Discussion question 3

What qualities does Charlie have that make him the hero of this story? What do those qualities say about Roald Dahl’s opinions of children? 




Charlie is what Roald Dahl thinks of as a 'perfect child', and all of the other children are used as examples of what Roald Dahl thinks flawed children are.  In the book, Charlie is a loving, unselfish young boy living in poverty with his large family.  "Here Mother, have a bit.  We'll share it.  I want everybody to taste it" (29).  He seems to always do what is right, and that trait has earned him much respect throughout his family.  These are the traits that Roald Dahl believes that every good child should have.  However, Charlie does make one selfish act in this book.  This occurs when he finds a dollar on the street and he uses it to by himself a couple of chocolate bars.  The one selfish act that Charlie commits just happens to be the most pivotal point in the book, for one of those chocolate bars just happened to have a golden ticket inside.  The other children are examples of what Roald Dahl thinks that some children are like in society.  He was very harsh about this, and he used some very extreme examples.  In the end, all of the other children were forced to leave the tour due to their selfish acts.  They all had their major flaws that made them different from the 'perfect child'.  Roald Dahl made this very clear in his book.  He was trying to send a message to all of the boys and girls and forcing them to make comparisons to the 5 characters.  On the back of the book, it says, "...and Charlie Bucket, our Hero, a boy who is honest and kind..."  (back).  Notice the word, our, in that sentence.  Roald Dahl is trying to say how Charlie is the savior of the book.  He is trying to get the readers to understand that there are many selfish and spoiled children in the world and that Charlie is the 'last hope'.  By saying the word, our, he is forcing the audience to 'root' for Charlie so they can realize how flawed the other children are.  Although the other children did make mistakes that nearly cost them their lives, it is hard to resist when you are in such a magical place.  The children where just in the moment and where to young to realize what they were doing was a mistake.  In the end, Charlie Bucket was the last one remaining, and the hero of the book got the biggest reward of his life, Wonka's Factory.     

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Discussion question 2

Discuss what Oompa Loompas represent in today's society.

Oompa Loompas represent the hardworking middle class.  Oopma Loompas, formaly from Loompaland, are the workers inside of Willie Wonka's Chocolate Factory.  "They are wonderful workers.  They all speak english now.  They love dancing and music.  They are always making up songs"  (71).  Whenever an Oompa Loompa is encountered in the story, there always seems to be a fun and heartwarming vibe.  Not once so far has an Oompa Loompa been described as being miserable.  This sort of working environment is similar to the environment at Google.  In English class, we watched a video about how Google gives their employees a fun work environment with plenty of fun activites that they can participate in outside of the office.  Similar to the Oompa Loompas in Wonka's factory, the Google employees seem to always have a smile on their face.  However, working at Google can be a very tough job, and the employees are not afraid to admit it.  The job is not right for everyone, for Google handpicks their employees based on their unique talents.  At Wonka's factory, the Oompa Loompas are used for various testings, some which can be incredibly fatal.  "I've tried it twenty times on twenty oompa loompas, and every one of them finished up as a blueberry" (98).  Also, living their entire lives in a factory, as magical as it is, probably doesn't appeal to the Oompa Loompas.  However way you look at it, there is no perfect job.  Every job has it's minor, or even major, setbacks.  Although Oompa Loompas can be viewed as tiny workers living the dream, they still have to get up every morning and do what middle class citizens do every day: work.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014






Connect Charlie to Michael Drysch

The book, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, is one that just about everyone can enjoy.  A heartwarming tale, this book has many themes and characters that many people can appreciate or even relate to.  The main character, Charlie Bucket, receives the opportunity of a lifetime to go and visit, "the largest and most famous chocolate factory in the world!" (7).  He goes from a young boy living in poverty, to a celebrity as millions of people would die to be in the position he is in.  This theme of, "going from nothing to something" is a theme that really interests me.  I think it is really cool to learn about the paths that some people have taken to get to the point that they are at.  You can learn alot from them in both a positive and negative way.  The man that I decided to use as an example for this theme is Michael Drysch.  Michael was just a computer technician from the state of Illinois.  Then, similar to Charlie, along came this once in a lifetime opportunity to sink a halfcourt shot for $75,000 during a Heat vs. Pistons game in Miami.  He was one of 30,000 contestants that entered to take part in the halftime show.  Similar to Charlie, the odds were not in his favor.  In the end, however, the odds didn't matter, for Mike received this opportunity and ran with it.  He appeared in the halftime show on January 25, 2013, and guess what?  He drained the halfcourt shot.  It was no bank or lucky bounce off the rim either, it was a pure swoosh.  Instantly, the video of him making the shot went viral.  He appeared in several commercials and even on the hit TV show, Good Morning America.  He went from a normal, middle-class american citizen to a celebrity by receiving an opportunity that will define him for the rest of his life, kind of like Charlie.



Monday, February 3, 2014

In the world of twitter, users can "tweet" messages 140 characters or less for other users to see.  The twitter icon is represented by a blue background and a white bird in the center, hense the term,"tweet". 
I think that this article about a school monitoring social media is a bit extreme.  I am going to use my favorite social media site, twitter, as an example. I am all for the protection of students, but I think that monitoring something like twitter is something that can't happen.  Twitter is a fun way to express your thoughts to your friends.  If kids are bullying someone so bad over something like twitter, then chances are someone will see it and put a stop to it.  The person that is being bullied can even block the person who is bullying them, so they can't even see the harmful tweets anyway.  For this reason, I think it is unnecessary for a school to barge in on student's personal lives.  It is unnecessary, and it is not what most kids want. Student Social Media Debate

If SRVHS were to enforce a social media monitoring system, I would go crazy. Should Schools Monitor Social Media Accounts? Twitter is very popular amongst students here at our schoool, and is one of my favorite things to use in my free time.  If I knew that the school was aware of everything that I tweeted, it would take the fun out of twitter. Students are already constantly monitored at school and by their parents, and twitter is one of the last places where they can share their thoughts independently.  We're aware that everything tweeted can be seen by everyone and anyone, and even if you delete the tweet, it is still out there on the internet. Watch What you Tweet That, in my opionion, is all of the monitoring that is needed, and any extra monitoring is a waste of money and is unnecesarry.
This chart shows how physical bullying is much more common than cyberbullying.  Therefore, schools should focus more on preventing physical bullying.


Monday, December 9, 2013




I think that our group did a great job with our first two discussions.  However, the rubric of our first discussion showed that we still had a ways to go.  As a group, we decided that everybody needed to participate more and create better discussion questions.  In our second discussion, we did a fantastic job of inproving in these areas where we needed improvement, and the result was a much smoother discussion and a better grade.  We improved in these areas by going in a clockwise circle to make sure that everybody participated for each 4 minute discussion time period.  Personally, I also used post its and brought in an outside source to raise my grade.  Although we made a great improvement from our 1st discussionand to our 2nd one, there is always room for improvement.  Our goal for our next discussion is for everybody to use post-its and for everybody to bring in an outside source.

Friday, November 1, 2013


Whether a society thrives or not all has to do with the leadership. Just think about it. If america had no leader, our country would be in chaos. A good leader has to have many qualities that will allow for a controlled and safe environment. These qualities include being unbiased, having respect from society, and being voted for by the public.  

If the leader only looks at problems from one perspective, chances are the wrong decision will be made. Looking at decisions at an unbiased perspective and viewing society as a whole, the correct decision will be made every time. Another quality all leaders should have is respect. Without respect, the people simply won't listen listen to the leader, and the leader could be overthrown. The last quality that every leader should have is that he/she should be voted for by the public. A leader that is chosen by election will have more respect from the citizens, and will be a better leader due to the fact that one is not just born into power.

In LOTF, havoc is beginning to spread due to lack of leadership and morality. Ralph, the leader, is not respected by the society as much as he should be, and has not been making decisions based on the good of all kids. He has not proven to the kids that he is the dominant leader that people should follow. Jack, the boy who is trying to take over the leadership role, is doing a better job of leading. Although he is making savage decisions, and wasn't originally voted for, he is convincing the kids that his way is the right way.